The NFL landscape is on the brink of significant change with the anticipated expansion of the regular season from 17 to 18 games. Amidst this shift, teams are beginning to adjust their strategies, particularly in how they manage player contracts. A prime example of this forward-thinking approach is found in the Cleveland Browns' recent negotiations with star player Myles Garrett.
Adapting to the Future: Garrett's Contract Reflects Potential NFL Changes
In a proactive move, the Browns have structured Myles Garrett's contract to accommodate the expected increase in regular-season games. Details of the contract, which have been reviewed by Pro Football Talk (PFT), include specific provisions that adapt to these potential changes, ensuring financial and operational clarity for both player and team.Financial Flexibility with Game Expansion
Garrett's contract is particularly innovative in how it handles per-game roster bonuses. According to the agreement, Garrett could earn up to $1 million per year based on his presence on the active, game-day roster. The contract specifies, "If there is a change in the number of regular season games, the per game bonus will change by dividing the maximum total bonus amount by the number of regular season games in that specific season." This means, for example, if the NFL moves to an 18-game season, Garrett's per-game earnings would adjust to $55,555.55.
Roster Size Adjustments and Their Impact
The agreement also addresses potential adjustments in the game-day roster size, a change that could accompany the addition of regular season games. The contract states, "If the active list number is changed, that active list number will be used to determine if the bonus is earned on a per game basis." This clause shows the Browns' meticulous planning for various future scenarios, ensuring that contractual terms remain relevant and equitable.The Browns' History of Anticipating NFL Changes
This isn't the first time the Browns have shown foresight regarding NFL structural changes. Last year, they proposed a two-week delay in the trade deadline, anticipating a shift from 16 to 17 games and then to 18. While the owners ultimately approved a one-week delay, the Browns' initiative highlights their proactive approach to league developments.